ISSN: 1906-117X


Scaffolding Technique: An Approach to Zone of Proximal Development for EFL Learners

Scaffolding Technique: An Approach to Zone of Proximal Development for EFL Learners

วาปี คงอินทร์





Learning EFL tends to require explicit learning inevitably to promote the use of language pattern on basis of native speakers’ models, i.e., American or British English. Many tasks in forms of drills and exercises are adopted to train the learners repeatedly so that they learn the grammatical structure and contextual use by heart. However, such a method cannot guarantee the success in learning new knowledge through completion of the tasks by the learners alone without sufficient assistance from the more skilled individual. The aim of this paper is to describe the characteristics of scaffolding technique and how it can be applied to promote EFL class.




Scaffolding Technique, Zone of Proximal Development, English as a Foreign Language


Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How People
Learn: Brain, Mind, and Experience & School. Washington,
DC: National Academy Press.
Brooks, F., Donato. & R. (1995). Expanding the research on
collaborative discourse in the L2 classroom. Paper presented
at the Second Annual Gathering for Sociocultural
Theory and L2. Athens, GA: University of Georgia.
Chang, K., I. Chen, & Sung.Y. (2002). “The effect of concept
mapping to enhance text comprehension and
summarization.” The Journal of Experimental Education,
71(1), 5-23.
Krashen, S.D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications.
New York: Longman.
Krashen, S.D. & Terrell, T. 1983. The Natural Approach: Language
acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.
McDevitt, T.M. & Ormrod, J.E. (2002). Child Development and
Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Olson, J. & Platt, J. (2000). “The Instructional Cycle.” Teaching
Children and Adolescents with Special Needs. Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Prodomou, L. (1988). “English as cultural action.” ELT Journal, 42(2),
Raymond, E. (2000). Learners with Mild Disabilities. Needham
Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Tajeddin, Z. & Tayebipour, F. (2015). “Interface between L2 learners’
pragmatic performance, language proficiency, and
individual/group ZPD.” Applied Research
on English Language, 4(1), 31-44.
Van Compernolle, R . A. (2010). “Incidental microgenetic
development in second - language teacher learner talk - in -
interaction.” Classroom Discourse, 1(1), 66-81.
Van Compernolle, R . A. & Kinginger, C. (2013). “Promoting
metapragmatic development through assessment in the zone
of proximal development.” Language Teaching Research, 17(3),
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The developmental of higher
psychological process. Cambridge MA: Harvard University
Wing, J. & Putney, L. (2002). A vision of Vygotsky. Boston: Allyn &
Wood, D., Bruner, J., & G. Ross. 1976. “The role of tutoring in
problem-solving.” Journal of Child Psychology and
Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.